Senate restores quorum to beleaguered NLRB

The board has found itself at the center of a battle over its independence and enforcement authority.

Dec. 22, 2025 - HR Dive
Ryan Golden, Senior Reporter

Dive Brief:

Dive Insight:

Since Trump’s inauguration last January, NLRB has found itself at the center of a battle over its independence and its authority to enforce labor standards.

Wilcox’s firing, for example, formed part of a broader challenge of constraints on executive power. The former member of the board fought her dismissal in court, seeking ・and temporarily succeeding in getting ・reinstatement. But the Supreme Court upheld an order pausing Wilcox’s return and took up a separate case, Trump v. Slaughter, to decide whether Trump could fire Wilcox and similar federal officials at will. At oral arguments earlier this month, the court seemed likely to hold in Trump’s favor.

Separately, the state legislatures of California and New York sought to grant state labor regulators more power to fill in for NLRB when its lack of quorum left it unable to fulfill certain functions. The board challenged both efforts. A federal judge paused enforcement of New York’s law, and litigation in both cases, NLRB v. State New York and NLRB v. State of California, remains ongoing.

The agency did continue some work during this time, including rescinding Biden-era enforcement documents on subjects such as employer surveillance, the use of artificial intelligence tools and noncompete agreements.